About
Industry
- Customer Support, BPO, Sales, Contact Centers
Application Type
- Intelligent call monitoring and coaching platform
Core Functionality
- Automated call scoring, sentiment analysis, compliance tracking, coaching recommendations
The client operates large-scale contact centers where thousands of conversations take place every day. Traditional QA teams could manually review only a small portion of calls, typically 2–5 percent. This created inconsistent scoring, delayed feedback, and frequent compliance misses.
They needed an automated system capable of reviewing every call, understanding tone and sentiment, detecting violations, and giving agents real-time guidance. The solution required advanced speech recognition, LLM-based evaluation, acoustic analysis, and a QA-scoring engine aligned with their internal frameworks.
Results
These improvements highlight how automated QA streamlines operations and lift overall call quality.
Reduced Work
98% reduction in manual QA workload
Complete Coverage
100 percent call coverage, up from 5 percent sampled manually
Precision
92% scoring accuracy compared to human QA
Faster Feedback
3x faster feedback cycles for agents
Better Quality
40% improvement in agent performance due to timely coaching
Fewer Errors
60% reduction in compliance violations thanks to real-time alerts
The automated call quality system transformed our QA operations and gave us visibility we never had before.
Challenges
Why It Mattered
Call quality directly influences customer satisfaction, retention, and brand perception. Automating QA ensures consistent scoring at scale while reducing costs and giving agents the coaching they need to improve quickly.
Our Approach-
We built an end-to-end AI-driven QA platform that evaluates every call for quality, compliance, and coaching insights in real time.
Our Tools:
Speech-to-Text
- Whisper
- DeepSpeech
- Google STT
NLP & LLM
- GPT-4
- LLaMA
- BERT models
- sentiment classifiers
Acoustic Analysis
- Praat
- PyDub
- audio feature extraction tools
Backend
- Python
- FastAPI
- Node.js
Frontend
- React.js
- Next.js
Databases
- PostgreSQL
- ElasticSearch
- Redis
DevOps
- Docker
- AWS Lambda
- ECS
- CloudWatch
Integrations
- CRM platforms
- dialers
- call recording APIs
Before & After
This comparison shows how AI-driven QA delivers consistent accuracy, faster feedback, and stronger agent performance across every campaign.
| Feature / Metric | Before — Manual QA | After — AI-Powered QA |
|---|---|---|
| Call Coverage | 5% sampled | 100% analyzed |
| QA Workload | High, repetitive | 98% automated |
| Feedback Speed | 3–7 days | Instant recommendations |
| Scoring Accuracy | Inconsistent | 92% consistent scoring |
| Compliance Detection | Often missed | 60% fewer violations |
| Agent Improvement | Slow due to delayed coaching | 40% improvement via real-time coaching |
Similar Case study
Let’s Collaborate!
Reach Out To Our Subject Matter Experts
Find out how MoogleLabs can help your organization. We’d love to answer your queries.




